Scott Steg ([info]scottsteg) wrote,
@ 2007-10-24 14:26:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Internet Bubble Version 2.0
I really don't understand the reasoning behind this other than dropping cash for exposure...

Microsoft just announced it is investing $240M for a minority 1.6 percent stake in Facebook, a price that values the social networking site at $15B.

In 2005, MySpace was bought by Fox Interactive Media for $580M. They also signed a deal with Google for $900M so they can use Google's display ads and search on their site.

And we know how Google bought America's Funniest Home Videos YouTube for $1.65B to tap into that audience who can't get enough of soccer goals and people getting hit in the nuts with a wiffle bat want to watch TV from a tiny flash window.

My big question is, haven't we already learned from the Dot-Com Bubble of 2001?!?! Companies are spending more money hand over foot for the next big stake and I'm sorry, I don't see Facebook, Myspace or Friendster being that relevant 5 years from now. Haven't we learned that already from Geocities? Angelfire? TheGlobe.com? Do we really think ads will prevail here? I know brand exposure is the key here, but I really think this money will run out soon.

Makes me think Google is this year's Netscape and Microsoft is this year's AOL.



Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…